 |
Fourier-transform
NMR
A major breakthrough occurred
in 1966. Richard R. Ernst then discovered (together
with Weston A. Anderson, USA) that the sensitivity of
NMR spectra could be increased dramatically if the
slow frequency sweep was replaced by short, intense
radiofrequency pulses. The pulses cause a signal to
be emitted by the nuclei. This signal is measured as
a function of time after the pulse. It cannot be
interpreted directly. Ernst discovered, however, that
it was possible to extract the resonance frequencies
from such a signal and to convert the signal into a
NMR spectrum by a mathematical operation (Fourier*
transformation, FT). This is performed rapidly in a
computer. The whole process can be compared with
stretching both arms over a piano and pushing all the
keys at the same time. All the tones are there, but
they are difficult to distinguish. A computer can
discern the different tones (frequencies).
Ernst's discovery is the
basis of modern NMR spectroscopy, called FT NMR. It
leads to a tenfold, and sometimes 100-fold increase
in sensitivity since the pulse response contains
information on all resonance frequencies at the same
time. During the same time needed to record a single
conventional spectrum, the FT experiment can be
repeated many times and the results summed by a
computer. FT NMR makes it possible to study small
amounts of material as well as chemically interesting
isotopes of low natural abundance.
* Fourier was a French
mathematician, who lived 200 years ago.
|
 |
| |
The diagram a) shows a NMR signal from carbon-13
nuclei (which only occur in 1% of all the carbon
atoms in nature) in ethyl benzene solution, obtained
with the pulse technique by accumulating the response
of the nuclear spins to two hundred pulses. The total
experiment time was 20 minutes. After Fourier
transformation, one obtains the carbon-13 NMR
spectrum in the diagram b). If the experiment was
performed with the old technique, in the same time
one would only manage to perform a single sweep and
the spectrum would look like the diagram c).
|
|