|
1901 2012
Prize category:
|
The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1984
Bruce Merrifield
Press Release
17 October 1984
The
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award the
1984 Nobel Prize in chemistry to
Professor R. Bruce Merrifield, Rockefeller University, New
York, USA,
for his development of methodology for chemical synthesis on a
solid matrix.
Summary
R. Bruce Merrifield, Professor at Rockefeller University, has
been awarded the Nobel Prize in chemistry for 1984 for his
development of a simple and ingenious method for obtaining
peptides and proteins. This method has created completely new
possibilities in the field of peptide and protein chemistry,
which is Merrifield's own area of research, as well as in the
field of nucleic acid chemistry, where other researchers have
applied Merrifield's ideas. Merrifield's method has greatly
stimulated progress in biochemistry, molecular biology,
pharmacology and medicine. It is also of practical importance,
both for the development of new drugs and for gene technology.
Merrifield's method involves binding the first of the many amino
acid residues of which a protein is composed to a special
substance called a polymer. Such a synthesis is more rapid than
those achieved with earlier methods and the quantity of final
product obtained is considerably greater.
Background information
The chemical reactions which
take place in living organisms are not spontaneous, but require
the involvement of catalysts. These catalysts are called
proteins. The first step in the formation (biosynthesis) of a
protein in a living organism is the construction of a linear
molecule called a peptide and composed of a large number of amino
acid residues. In general these peptides can be subsequently
modified in a number of ways. There are about 20 amino acids
which are commonly used in the biosynthesis of proteins and the
number of possible variations is virtually unlimited. A number of
hormones and other signal substances which regulate different
life processes are also peptides, but these compounds contain
considerably fewer amino acid residues than do proteins.
We know the detailed structure of a large number of proteins and
peptides, thanks to the efforts of Frederick Sanger (Nobel Prizewinner in
1958) and Stanford Moore and William
H. Stein (Nobel Prizewinners in 1972), among others. A very
important contribution was also made by the Swedish researcher
Pehr Edman, who unfortunately died relatively young but who left
behind an automated method for determining peptide structure
which is now used routinely throughout the scientific world. The
chemical synthesis of peptides is an important task for organic
chemists and the principle generally used today for such
synthesis was developed a relatively long time ago by the Nobel
Prizewinner in chemistry for 1902, Emil Fischer (Fig.1). All amino acids contain two typical
functional groups, an acid (carboxylic) group and a basic (amino)
group. When the amino group in one amino acid reacts with the
carboxylic group in another, the resulting chemical bond gives
rise to a dipeptide. In order for this reaction to take
place in a controlled manner, the carboxylic group on amino acid
1 and the amino group in amino acid 2, groups which are not to be
involved in the reaction, must be protected. If one of these
protecting groups in the dipeptide is later selectively removed
and reaction with a third amino acid containing one protected
group carried out, a tripeptide is formed. And so forth.
This approach is simple in theory, but difficult in practice.
After each step the product must be separated from biproducts and
unreacted starting material and loss of product is inevitable
during such separation. When the Nobel Prizewinner in chemistry
for 1955, Vincent du Vigneaud,
synthesized the peptide hormone oxytocin, which is a
nonpeptide, this was a very great step forward. To use
this method for synthesizing peptides containing some 100 amino
acid residues is truly an heroic task. If the yield in each
synthetic step is 90%, which is a very good yield, then the
overall yield after 100 steps would be 0.003%. In order to obtain
measurable amounts of the final product the first steps of the
synthesis would thus have to be conducted on a very large scale
and the synthesis becomes very tedious.
Merrifield solved this problem in a manner which is both simple
and ingenious (Fig. 2). He attaches the first
amino acid through its carboxylic group to a solid polymer. After
each synthetic step, byproducts and remaining starting materials
can thus be removed by filtration and washing the polymer. Only
when the entire synthesis has been completed is the peptide
removed from the polymer. The advantages of this method are very
considerable. Through the replacement of a complicated isolation
procedure for each intermediate product with a simple washing
procedure much time is saved. In addition, it has proven possible
to increase the yield in each individual step to 99.5% or better,
a result which cannot be attained using conventional synthetic
approaches. In the example given above the final overall yield
would thus be increased from 0.003% to 61%. Finally, this method
is also suitable for automation and automatic peptide
synthesizers are now commercially available.
Merrifield's methodology has brought about a revolution in
peptide and protein chemistry and thousands of different peptides
have now been synthesized using this approach. One milestone in
this respect was the synthesis of an active enzyme, ribonuclease
A, by Merrifield himself and his coworkers.
Merrifield's idea of performing a multistep synthesis with a
compound attached to a solid matrix as the starting material has
also been used in other areas. The most important of these is
undoubtedly the synthesis of oligonucleotides, which are needed
in hybrid DNA research. In this case as well an automated
apparatus which can be programmed to synthesize desired products
has been constructed. Although Merrifield has not worked in this
area himself, it is clearly his ideas which have found a new
application here.
Merrifield's methodology is a completely new approach to organic
synthesis. It has created new possibilities in the research
fields of peptide-protein chemistry and nucleic acid chemistry It
has greatly stimulated progress in biochemistry, molecular
biology, pharmacology and medicine. It is also of great practical
importance, both for the development of new drugs and for gene
technology.
![]() |
Figure 1. Synthesis of a tripeptide using conventional methodology. HO2C- is a carboxylic group, NH2- an amino group. A circle around a group indicates that it is protected and, thus, cannot react.
![]() |
Figure 2. Synthesis of a tripeptide using Merrifield´s methology.
MLA style: "Press Release: The 1984 Nobel Prize in Chemistry". Nobelprize.org. 24 May 2013 http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1984/press.html


